EVE Search - make high sec incursion sites pvp zones

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

make high sec incursion sites pvp zones

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Endeavour Starfleet Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 601	Posted - 2012.01.20 09:03:00 - [1] - Quote No thanks. Bad idea Sounds like like someone hates incursions and wants them removed. As this will do. Edit: Wow look the mass of absolutely HORRIBLE ideas and BS "reasons" to do this. Stop trying to pretend you want anything more than free kills because you are too cheap to gank. You suck at EVE therefore you want to COMPLETELY RUIN an ENTIRE FEATURE EXPANSION. Because people are either not going to your BS CTAs or you got blacklisted and want to cry and scream about it. This needs not to be implemented.
Endeavour Starfleet Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 601	Posted - 2012.01.20 09:36:00 - [2] - Quote Andski wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Maybe if you guys actually paid your rank and file members a bit more of the raw income from 0.0 spoils, you would have more available for ops, instead of seeing them running high sec incursions. last month we poured 18 tech moons worth of income into subcapital reimbursements alone, tell me more about how we don't give enough ISK to our members and wow one tech moon, i am impressed, we have to fuel/empty/time 60+ If you can't get your members into CTAs it means you aren't giving them enough. Tho something tells me that figure isn't accurate anyway. And even if it is. Then you are just as mad anyway because poor wittle nullsec moon empires might/are having to pour tech moon income into real SRP programs that are more than T1 frigs. So the solution to the lords is kill hisec and see how many come to your empire instead of leaving the game. Start with random people grouping for fun in hisec. Then kill mining (O wait that was first) Then kill any mission running. That should get them "members" to shut up about SRPs so we can enjoy our moon goo.
Endeavour Starfleet Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 601	Posted - 2012.01.20 10:53:00 - [3] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Caellach Marellus wrote: Signho wrote: Caellach Marellus wrote: If you want to compete with people in highsec incursions, get a fleet together and outgun them. Simple. you are missing the point of the OP. No I'm not. I know exactly what the OP is wanting here, I'm just telling them that they should probably try the current game mechanics to put risk in before poking and whining and demanding that someone else's game is broken. There is no risk under the current mechanics... Drunk logi, Fake Logi, Crap FC, Network issues, Mass DCs, Module misclicks, on and on. Compared to easy mode Anoms and Tech moons Incursions are downright risky. Especially with a pimped ship.
Endeavour Starfleet Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 601	Posted - 2012.01.20 11:01:00 - [4] - Quote Lady Spank wrote: Endeavour wrote: Drunk logi, Fake Logi, Crap FC, Network issues, Mass DCs, Module misclicks, on and on. Compared to easy mode Anoms and Tech moons Incursions are downright risky. Especially with a pimped ship. Please do not troll this thread. No one is this thick. I am not trolling tho I don't know what to say about you considering you posted this #1 In the wrong forum #2 Crap idea to completely ruin an ENTIRE EXPANSION so that nullsecers can force people back into CTAs again. (Because that is all you will be helping with this)
Endeavour Starfleet Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 601	Posted - 2012.01.20 11:19:00 - [5] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Drunk logi, Fake Logi, Crap FC, Network issues, Mass DCs, Module misclicks, on and on. Compared to easy mode Anoms and Tech moons Incursions are downright risky. Especially with a pimped ship. My AFK bomber causes more risk than you will ever face in a high sec incursion Ah you saw my topic about adding balance to AFK cloaking I see. Just in case any fool still thinks I have not had serious experience with the various imbalances in nullsec such as AFK cloaking being +1 Advantage for large alliances. So that is a very poor argument because an AFKer with no indication he has returned is a serious risk. Tho that is another argument altogether. I have stated just some of the reasons why Incursions are risky. Ignoring them in my opinion just shows willful ignorance on how they operate.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.